Skip to content

Extreme Long Range · Field Report

.22 LR Extreme Long Range World Record Attempt

Equipment performance, environmental conditions, ballistic data, and field observations from a full day of subsonic rimfire fire at a target beyond 1,500 yards.

AuthorScott Austin
DateJuly 16, 2026
DistanceOver 1,500 yards
Cartridge.22 Long Rifle

Summary

Stable overcast conditions and a nearly constant 0–3 mph crosswind produced an unusually clean day for evaluating rimfire ballistics at a target beyond 1,500 yards. No record was set, but the margins were narrow: three impacts on the spotter’s bunker, three on a red jacket near the target, and a positively identified miss one to four inches in front of the target’s right-front corner.

The dominant variable was muzzle velocity. A 57 fps extreme spread across 219 chronographed shots translated into roughly 158 yards of longitudinal dispersion at the target, with the tightest grouping occurring in a narrow velocity band near 1,101–1,104 fps. A secondary finding — that a forward observer could locate impacts by sound far more reliably than a digiscoping system could locate them by dust signature — proved decisive to the day’s productivity.

1,500+Yards to target
1,104.4Avg MV (fps)
57Extreme spread (fps)
9.694Time of flight (sec)
1,030.3Drop (feet)
7Impact energy (ft-lb)

Objective

Conduct an extreme long-range .22 LR shooting evaluation in preparation for a world-record attempt, while documenting equipment performance, environmental conditions, ballistic data, and field observations.

Initial Setup

Charlie TARAC Calibration

Initial calibration was performed using a high-precision digital level.

ParameterValue
Charlie TARAC elevation700 MOA
Initial elevation solution (Kestrel 5700 Elite)738 MOA total — 700 MOA on the Charlie, 38 MOA on the scope

Environmental Conditions

ConditionObserved
SkyOvercast
Temperature — morning65°F
Temperature — afternoon79°F
WindGenerally 0–3 mph, left to right; very consistent throughout the day
Maximum wind correction (incl. spin drift and Coriolis)20 MOA left

After adjusting for Coriolis, a number of wind corrections were minimal enough that holds were made directly on the target.

Ballistics

MeasurementValue
Muzzle velocity — average1,104 fps
Muzzle velocity — slowest1,082 fps
Muzzle velocity — fastest1,139 fps
Extreme spread57 fps
Time of flight9.694 sec
Remaining velocity at target290 fps
Remaining energy7 ft-lb
Drop12,363.21 in (1,030.3 ft)
Spin drift (1:16 RH barrel)12.71 MOA left
Coriolis (aiming primarily south)1.56 MOA left

Ammunition and Chronograph Results

Ammunition for the attempt was Lapua Center-X. Velocity data was captured with a Garmin Xero C1 Pro.

MetricValue
Total recorded shots219
Average muzzle velocity1,104.4 fps
Slowest1,082 fps
Fastest1,139 fps
Extreme spread57 fps

Velocity Observations

The most successful impacts occurred when muzzle velocities fell at approximately 1,101–1,104 fps. As velocities rose above or fell below that range, impacts moved predictably farther or nearer relative to the target. The Garmin velocity data made this trend surprisingly apparent and predictable during live firing.

There were, however, occasional unexplained longitudinal dispersions that did not correspond with muzzle velocity. The current working hypothesis is that these may have resulted from aerodynamic or atmospheric effects — possibly aerodynamic jump or thermal vertical movement — although additional testing will be required before drawing conclusions.

Wind Performance

Despite the extreme distance involved, wind remained remarkably cooperative. Typical holds ranged from directly on target up to approximately 20 MOA left. The relatively stable conditions allowed much greater emphasis to be placed on evaluating vertical dispersion and ballistic consistency.

Notable Impact Observations

Several observations demonstrated just how close numerous shots came to success.

Red Jacket

  • Hit three times.
  • One recovered bullet was found lodged in the left front pocket.
  • The projectile showed remarkably little deformation.
  • Projectiles broke the first layer of Cordura on the coat.

Spotter’s Bunker

  • Struck three separate times.
  • All three impacts exhibited a circular, point-forward signature with no evidence of keyholing, indicating that the bullet most likely remained gyroscopically stable through impact.

Closest Observable Miss

The closest positively identified miss impacted approximately one to four inches in front of the target’s right-front corner. Video documentation exists confirming this impact.

Target

Target dimensions: 24 inches wide by 48 inches high, engaged at a distance of over 1,500 yards.

Equipment

ComponentSpecification
RifleVudoo Gun Works V3-RH-V22T 360 — 22″ barrel, MTU profile, 1:16 RH twist; TriggerTech Diamond two-stage straight trigger; KRG Bravo chassis with NV rail forward of the scope for mounting the Charlie TARAC
BipodLong Range Accuracy Light Tactical Bipod (long legs, 7–10″)
ScopeVortex Razor Gen II 4.5–27×56, EBR-7C (MOA)
Scope mountSpuhr
Anti-cantAccuracy First
AmmunitionLapua Center-X
ChronographGarmin Xero C1 Pro
Ballistic solverKestrel 5700 Elite with Applied Ballistics and Link
Spotting equipmentLeupold Gold Ring 20–60×80 and Leupold Gold Ring 20–40×60, both equipped with Impact reticles
DigiscopingOLLIN Snapshot Digiscoping System
TripodReally Right Stuff (RRS)
RangefindersLeica Geovid 3500.com and Leica Geovid 3200.com
Optical elevationCharlie TARAC (Target Acquisition and Ranging Accessory)
Precision levelDigi-Pas DWL3500XY-B high-precision two-axis digital machinist level
Rifle configuration note. The specifications for this rifle were recommended by Greg Roman, former Director of Compliance at Vudoo Gun Works. Greg was an exceptional resource, and I greatly appreciated the opportunity to tour the Vudoo facility while it was located in St. George, Utah. His recommendations played a significant role in configuring this rifle specifically for this attempt.

Charlie TARAC

The Charlie TARAC optically shifts the image entering the objective lens, allowing approximately 900 additional minutes of elevation and making otherwise impossible scope adjustments achievable.

Precision Level

The Digi-Pas DWL3500XY-B was used to accurately calibrate the Charlie TARAC to the required 700 MOA elevation before firing.

Digiscoping Performance

Shots were recorded on video and mirrored live to a Smart TV for impact observation. While this system performs exceptionally well with centerfire cartridges, the dust signatures produced by .22 LR projectiles proved too inconsistent for reliable shot calling. A forward spotter was therefore indispensable to the success of the mission.

Bulletproof Spotter’s Bunker

Constructed using ⅞-inch plywood. Although .22 LR bullets remained gyroscopically stable at the target distance, they consistently penetrated approximately ¼ inch into the plywood upon impact.

world record attempt 22 long rifle
Bunker

Auditory Impact Detection

One of the more valuable observations from this attempt was the ability to use sound to assist in locating impacts.

Forward spotter Shepard Humphries noted that he was able to audibly spot about 380 of the 405 shots, and to visually spot approximately 25 impacts. He explained that with these hundreds of rounds of experience, his ability to audibly spot greatly improved, and that he was surprised how accurately one could home in on where a bullet lands — even small, slow bullets like ours.

Lessons Learned

  • Stable environmental conditions made this an outstanding day for evaluating extreme rimfire ballistics.
  • Approximately 1,100–1,104 fps produced the most consistent results — the sweet spot on this particular day.
  • Residual longitudinal dispersion needs to be researched. A small percentage of shots went long or short with no explanation, despite promising velocities. Thermals and aerodynamic jump are the leading candidates.
  • Observing dust signature alone is insufficient for consistent ELR .22 LR spotting.
  • A forward observer listening for impacts dramatically increases the probability of identifying them and making useful corrections. See his report here.

Appendix: Technical Q&A

Why trust the last bullet fired more than a wind flag or mirage, especially with something as wind-sensitive as .22 LR?

One of the pioneers in the ELR game is Todd Hodnett out of Texas. One of his favorite sayings is that the bullet doesn’t get to vote, and it doesn’t lie. The bullet impact itself gives me the best real-world data, and from there it becomes simply a matter of walking rounds in — though of course there is a process for that.

The bullet doesn’t lie, you must listen.Ken Oehler

What do the ballistic calculations say the impact point would be at the lowest and highest velocities fired?

  • At 1,082 fps: roughly 55 yards short.
  • At 1,139 fps: roughly 103 yards long.

Did you true the ballistic solution against the actual recorded impacts, or against a published BC?

We basically walked the bullets in close to the target.

Tell me about the rifle system used that day.

Vudoo Gun Works V22 360 Gen 3; 22″ MTU barrel, 1:16 twist; KRG Bravo chassis with an NV Picatinny mount for the Charlie.

What has to be true before someone can hit a target like this on demand instead of by probability?

Perfect wind and environmentals, perfect ammunition with extreme spreads within 3–4 fps, a perfect shooter, and so on.

Field report by Scott Austin · July 16, 2026 · All velocity, elevation, and dispersion figures as recorded on site.
Scott Austin & Shepard Humphries
Scott Austin & Shepard Humphries