Extreme Long Range · Field Report
.22 LR Extreme Long Range World Record Attempt
Equipment performance, environmental conditions, ballistic data, and field observations from a full day of subsonic rimfire fire at a target beyond 1,500 yards.
Summary
Stable overcast conditions and a nearly constant 0–3 mph crosswind produced an unusually clean day for evaluating rimfire ballistics at a target beyond 1,500 yards. No record was set, but the margins were narrow: three impacts on the spotter’s bunker, three on a red jacket near the target, and a positively identified miss one to four inches in front of the target’s right-front corner.
The dominant variable was muzzle velocity. A 57 fps extreme spread across 219 chronographed shots translated into roughly 158 yards of longitudinal dispersion at the target, with the tightest grouping occurring in a narrow velocity band near 1,101–1,104 fps. A secondary finding — that a forward observer could locate impacts by sound far more reliably than a digiscoping system could locate them by dust signature — proved decisive to the day’s productivity.
Objective
Conduct an extreme long-range .22 LR shooting evaluation in preparation for a world-record attempt, while documenting equipment performance, environmental conditions, ballistic data, and field observations.
Initial Setup
Charlie TARAC Calibration
Initial calibration was performed using a high-precision digital level.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Charlie TARAC elevation | 700 MOA |
| Initial elevation solution (Kestrel 5700 Elite) | 738 MOA total — 700 MOA on the Charlie, 38 MOA on the scope |
Environmental Conditions
| Condition | Observed |
|---|---|
| Sky | Overcast |
| Temperature — morning | 65°F |
| Temperature — afternoon | 79°F |
| Wind | Generally 0–3 mph, left to right; very consistent throughout the day |
| Maximum wind correction (incl. spin drift and Coriolis) | 20 MOA left |
After adjusting for Coriolis, a number of wind corrections were minimal enough that holds were made directly on the target.
Ballistics
| Measurement | Value |
|---|---|
| Muzzle velocity — average | 1,104 fps |
| Muzzle velocity — slowest | 1,082 fps |
| Muzzle velocity — fastest | 1,139 fps |
| Extreme spread | 57 fps |
| Time of flight | 9.694 sec |
| Remaining velocity at target | 290 fps |
| Remaining energy | 7 ft-lb |
| Drop | 12,363.21 in (1,030.3 ft) |
| Spin drift (1:16 RH barrel) | 12.71 MOA left |
| Coriolis (aiming primarily south) | 1.56 MOA left |
Ammunition and Chronograph Results
Ammunition for the attempt was Lapua Center-X. Velocity data was captured with a Garmin Xero C1 Pro.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total recorded shots | 219 |
| Average muzzle velocity | 1,104.4 fps |
| Slowest | 1,082 fps |
| Fastest | 1,139 fps |
| Extreme spread | 57 fps |
Velocity Observations
The most successful impacts occurred when muzzle velocities fell at approximately 1,101–1,104 fps. As velocities rose above or fell below that range, impacts moved predictably farther or nearer relative to the target. The Garmin velocity data made this trend surprisingly apparent and predictable during live firing.
There were, however, occasional unexplained longitudinal dispersions that did not correspond with muzzle velocity. The current working hypothesis is that these may have resulted from aerodynamic or atmospheric effects — possibly aerodynamic jump or thermal vertical movement — although additional testing will be required before drawing conclusions.
Wind Performance
Despite the extreme distance involved, wind remained remarkably cooperative. Typical holds ranged from directly on target up to approximately 20 MOA left. The relatively stable conditions allowed much greater emphasis to be placed on evaluating vertical dispersion and ballistic consistency.
Notable Impact Observations
Several observations demonstrated just how close numerous shots came to success.
Red Jacket
- Hit three times.
- One recovered bullet was found lodged in the left front pocket.
- The projectile showed remarkably little deformation.
- Projectiles broke the first layer of Cordura on the coat.
Spotter’s Bunker
- Struck three separate times.
- All three impacts exhibited a circular, point-forward signature with no evidence of keyholing, indicating that the bullet most likely remained gyroscopically stable through impact.
Closest Observable Miss
The closest positively identified miss impacted approximately one to four inches in front of the target’s right-front corner. Video documentation exists confirming this impact.
Target
Target dimensions: 24 inches wide by 48 inches high, engaged at a distance of over 1,500 yards.
Equipment
| Component | Specification |
|---|---|
| Rifle | Vudoo Gun Works V3-RH-V22T 360 — 22″ barrel, MTU profile, 1:16 RH twist; TriggerTech Diamond two-stage straight trigger; KRG Bravo chassis with NV rail forward of the scope for mounting the Charlie TARAC |
| Bipod | Long Range Accuracy Light Tactical Bipod (long legs, 7–10″) |
| Scope | Vortex Razor Gen II 4.5–27×56, EBR-7C (MOA) |
| Scope mount | Spuhr |
| Anti-cant | Accuracy First |
| Ammunition | Lapua Center-X |
| Chronograph | Garmin Xero C1 Pro |
| Ballistic solver | Kestrel 5700 Elite with Applied Ballistics and Link |
| Spotting equipment | Leupold Gold Ring 20–60×80 and Leupold Gold Ring 20–40×60, both equipped with Impact reticles |
| Digiscoping | OLLIN Snapshot Digiscoping System |
| Tripod | Really Right Stuff (RRS) |
| Rangefinders | Leica Geovid 3500.com and Leica Geovid 3200.com |
| Optical elevation | Charlie TARAC (Target Acquisition and Ranging Accessory) |
| Precision level | Digi-Pas DWL3500XY-B high-precision two-axis digital machinist level |
Charlie TARAC
The Charlie TARAC optically shifts the image entering the objective lens, allowing approximately 900 additional minutes of elevation and making otherwise impossible scope adjustments achievable.
Precision Level
The Digi-Pas DWL3500XY-B was used to accurately calibrate the Charlie TARAC to the required 700 MOA elevation before firing.
Digiscoping Performance
Shots were recorded on video and mirrored live to a Smart TV for impact observation. While this system performs exceptionally well with centerfire cartridges, the dust signatures produced by .22 LR projectiles proved too inconsistent for reliable shot calling. A forward spotter was therefore indispensable to the success of the mission.
Bulletproof Spotter’s Bunker
Constructed using ⅞-inch plywood. Although .22 LR bullets remained gyroscopically stable at the target distance, they consistently penetrated approximately ¼ inch into the plywood upon impact.

Auditory Impact Detection
One of the more valuable observations from this attempt was the ability to use sound to assist in locating impacts.
Forward spotter Shepard Humphries noted that he was able to audibly spot about 380 of the 405 shots, and to visually spot approximately 25 impacts. He explained that with these hundreds of rounds of experience, his ability to audibly spot greatly improved, and that he was surprised how accurately one could home in on where a bullet lands — even small, slow bullets like ours.
Lessons Learned
- Stable environmental conditions made this an outstanding day for evaluating extreme rimfire ballistics.
- Approximately 1,100–1,104 fps produced the most consistent results — the sweet spot on this particular day.
- Residual longitudinal dispersion needs to be researched. A small percentage of shots went long or short with no explanation, despite promising velocities. Thermals and aerodynamic jump are the leading candidates.
- Observing dust signature alone is insufficient for consistent ELR .22 LR spotting.
- A forward observer listening for impacts dramatically increases the probability of identifying them and making useful corrections. See his report here.
Appendix: Technical Q&A
Why trust the last bullet fired more than a wind flag or mirage, especially with something as wind-sensitive as .22 LR?
One of the pioneers in the ELR game is Todd Hodnett out of Texas. One of his favorite sayings is that the bullet doesn’t get to vote, and it doesn’t lie. The bullet impact itself gives me the best real-world data, and from there it becomes simply a matter of walking rounds in — though of course there is a process for that.
What do the ballistic calculations say the impact point would be at the lowest and highest velocities fired?
- At 1,082 fps: roughly 55 yards short.
- At 1,139 fps: roughly 103 yards long.
Did you true the ballistic solution against the actual recorded impacts, or against a published BC?
We basically walked the bullets in close to the target.
Tell me about the rifle system used that day.
Vudoo Gun Works V22 360 Gen 3; 22″ MTU barrel, 1:16 twist; KRG Bravo chassis with an NV Picatinny mount for the Charlie.
What has to be true before someone can hit a target like this on demand instead of by probability?
Perfect wind and environmentals, perfect ammunition with extreme spreads within 3–4 fps, a perfect shooter, and so on.
